Numerous research examples from a wide range of areas illustrate how to apply these principles and how to estimate substantive significance instead of just statistical significance. Additional alternatives to statistical tests are described, including meta-analysis, resampling techniques like bootstrapping, and Bayesian estimation.
All Rights Reserved. This book explains how to conduct psychological research via the WWW, and outlines everything needed to get started?
It contains many examples ready to use on the Web, with brief discussions of the psychological theories being tested. For those involved in behavioral research, interested in exploring a new medium with many advantages over traditional research methods.
Inviting and conversational, the book leads readers through the research process from start to finish. It begins with tips and strategies for generating research ideas, moves to selecting measures and participants, and then offers an examination of research strategy and design.
This step-by-step presentation emphasizes the decisions researchers must make at each stage of the process. The authors avoid a cookbook approach by linking terminology with applied concepts; their lecture in a book style makes the text accessible by emphasizing discussion and explanation of topics. Examples and content throughout the book reflect the most current APA guidelines. Important Notice: Media content referenced within the product description or the product text may not be available in the ebook version.
A broad theory of research methodology for psychology and the behavioral sciences that offers a coherent treatment of a range of behavioral research methods. This book considers scientific method in the behavioral sciences, with particular reference to psychology. Psychologists learn about research methods and use them to conduct their research, but their training teaches them little about the nature of scientific method itself. Drawing on behavioral science methodology, the philosophy of science, and statistical theory, Haig constructs a broad theory of scientific method that has particular relevance for the behavioral sciences.
He terms this account of method the abductive theory of method ATOM in recognition of the importance it assigns to explanatory reasoning. ATOM offers the framework for a coherent treatment of a range of quantitative and qualitative behavioral research methods, giving equal treatment to data-analytic methods and methods of theory construction.
Haig draws on the new experimentalism in the philosophy of science to reconstruct the process of phenomena detection as it applies to psychology; he considers the logic and purpose of exploratory factor analysis; he discusses analogical modeling as a means of theory development; and he recommends the use of inference to the best explanation for evaluating theories in psychology. Finally, he outlines the nature of research problems, discusses the nature of the abductive method, and describes applications of the method to grounded theory method and clinical reasoning.
The book will be of interest not only to philosophers of science but also to psychological researchers who want to deepen their conceptual understanding of research methods and methodological concerns. Now in its fourth edition, Behavioral Research and Analysis: An Introduction to Statistics within the Context of Experimental Design presents an overview of statistical methods within the context of experimental design.
It covers fundamental topics such as data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, and communication of findings. New in the Fourth Edition: Extensive improvements based on suggestions from those using this book in the classroom Statistical procedures that have been developed and validated since the previous edition Each chapter in the body now contains relevant key words, chapter summaries, key word definitions, and end of chapter exercises with answers Revisions to include recent changes in the APA Style Manual When looking for a book for their own use, the authors found none that were totally suitable.
They found books that either reviewed the basics of behavioral research and experimental design but provided only cursory coverage of statistical methods or they provided coverage of statistical methods with very little coverage of the research context within which these methods are used. No single resource provided coverage of methodology, statistics, and communication skills. In a classic example of necessity being the mother of invention, the authors created their own.
This text is ideal for a single course that reviews research methods, essential statistics through multi-factor analysis of variance, and thesis or major project preparation without discussion of derivation of equations, probability theory, or mathematic proofs.
It focuses on essential information for getting a research project completed without prerequisite math or statistics training. It has been revised many times to help students at a variety of academic levels exceptional high school students, undergraduate honors students, masters students, doctoral students, and post-doctoral fellows across varied academic disciplines e.
Illustrating how to plan, prepare, conduct, and analyze an experimental or research report, the book emphasizes explaining statistical procedures and interpreting obtained results without discussing the derivation of equations or history of the method.
Destined to spend more time on your desk than on the shelf, the book will become the single resource you reach for again and again when conducting scientific research and reporting it to the scientific community. Skip to content. Methods in Behavioral Research. Author : Paul Chris Cozby. Methods in Behavioral Research Book Review:. Author : Paul C. Methods for Behavioral Research. Author : Paul D. Students will be able to take a variety of practice quizzes, as well as explore the Internet through exercises and links that complement the text.
In addition, Paul C. This site provides easy access to more information about topics presented in the text through resources available on the Internet. Ready, Set, Go! It provides students with affordable, professional statistical analysis and modeling tools. The easy-to-use interface and comprehensive online help system enable students to learn statistics, not software. Thanks go to development editor Kirk Bomont, xiii xiv Preface who was invaluable in developing the manuscript.
Thanks also to individuals who have provided important input, particularly Diana Kyle, Jennifer Siciliani, and Kathy Brown. We are extremely grateful for the input from numerous students and instructors, including the following individuals, who provided detailed reviews for this edition: Kimberley Duff, Cerritos College Traci Giuliano, Southwestern University Leona Johnson, Hampton University Michael MacLean, Buffalo State College Mark Stellmack, University of Minnesota We are always interested in receiving comments and suggestions from students and instructors.
Please e-mail us at [email protected] or [email protected] fullerton. About the Authors Paul C. Cozby was an undergraduate at the University of California, Riverside, and received his Ph. He is a fellow of the American Psychological Association and a member of the Association for Psychological Science; he has served as officer of the Society for Computers in Psychology.
Scott C. He earned a B. His research interests and experiences are varied. He has conducted research in areas as wide-ranging as adolescent problem behavior and problem-behavior prevention, teaching and learning in higher education, and the psychological consequences of growing and tending plants in outer space.
Describe the scientific approach to learning about behavior and contrast it with pseudoscientific research. Define and give examples of the four goals of scientific research: description, prediction, determination of cause, and explanation of behavior. Discuss the three elements for inferring causation: temporal order, covariation of cause and effect, and elimination of alternative explanations. Define and describe basic and applied research.
How do we remember things, what causes us to forget, and how can memory be improved? What are the effects of stressful environments on health?
How do early childhood experiences affect later development? What are the best ways to treat depression? How can we reduce prejudice and intergroup conflict?
Curiosity about questions such as these is probably the most important reason that many students decide to take courses in the behavioral sciences. Scientific research provides us with the best means of addressing such questions and providing answers. In this book, we will examine the methods of scientific research in the behavioral sciences.
In this introductory chapter, we will focus on ways in which knowledge of research methods can be useful in understanding the world around us. Further, we will review the characteristics of a scientific approach to the study of behavior and the general types of research questions that concern behavioral scientists.
Survey results are frequently reported that draw conclusions about our beliefs concerning a variety of topics. The key question is, how do you evaluate such reports?
Do you simply accept the findings because they are supposed to be scientific? A background in research methods will help you to read these reports critically, evaluate the methods employed, and decide whether the conclusions are reasonable.
Many occupations require the use of research findings. For example, mental health professionals must make decisions about treatment methods, assignment of clients to different types of facilities, medications, and testing procedures. Such decisions are made on the basis of research; to make good decisions, mental health professionals must be able to read the research literature in the field and apply it in their professional lives.
Similarly, people who work in business environments frequently rely on research to make decisions about marketing strategies, ways of improving employee productivity and morale, and methods of selecting and training new employees.
Educators must keep up with research on topics such as the effectiveness of different teaching strategies or programs to deal with special student problems. Knowledge of research methods and the ability to evaluate research reports are useful in many fields. It is also important to recognize that scientific research has become increasingly prominent in public policy decisions. Legislators and political leaders at all levels of government frequently take political positions and propose legislation 2 The Scientific Approach based on research findings.
Research may also influence judicial decisions: A prime example of this is the Social Science Brief that was prepared by psychologists and accepted as evidence in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education in which the U. Supreme Court banned school segregation in the United States. One of the studies cited in the brief was conducted by Clark and Clark , who found that when allowed to choose between light-skinned and darkskinned dolls, both Black and White children preferred to play with the lightskinned dolls see Stephan, , for a further discussion of the implications of this study.
Behavioral research on human development has influenced U. Supreme Court decisions related to juvenile crime. In , for instance, the Supreme Court decided that juveniles could not face the death penalty Roper v. Simmons , and the decision was informed by neurological and behavioral research showing that the brain, social, and character differences between adults and juveniles make juveniles less culpable than adults for the same crimes.
Similarly, in the Supreme Court decision Graham v. Florida, the Supreme Court decided that juvenile offenders could not be sentenced to life in prison without parole for non-homicide offenses. This decision was influenced by a friend of the court brief filed by the American Psychological Association that cited research in developmental psychology and neuroscience.
In addition, psychologists studying ways to improve the accuracy of eyewitness identification e. Department of Justice, and provided science-based perspectives on the value of confessions.
Research is also important when developing and assessing the effectiveness of programs designed to achieve certain goals—for example, to increase retention of students in school, influence people to engage in behaviors that reduce their risk of contracting HIV, or teach employees how to reduce the effects of stress.
We need to be able to determine whether these programs are successfully meeting their goals. How does the scientific approach differ from other ways of learning about behavior?
People have always observed the world around them and sought explanations for what they see and experience. However, instead of using a scientific approach, many people rely on intuition and authority as ways of knowing. Then, within a very short period of time, they find that the woman is pregnant. This observation leads to a common belief that adoption increases the likelihood of pregnancy among couples who are having difficulties conceiving a child.
Such a conclusion seems intuitively reasonable, and people usually have an explanation for this effect—for example, the adoption reduces a major source of marital stress, and the stress reduction in turn increases the chances of conception see Gilovich, This example illustrates the use of intuition and anecdotal evidence to draw general conclusions about the world around us.
The intuitive approach takes many forms. Often, it involves finding an explanation for our own behaviors or the behaviors of others. A problem with intuition is that numerous cognitive and motivational biases affect our perceptions, and so we may draw erroneous conclusions about cause and effect cf.
Gilovich points out that there is in fact no relationship between adoption and subsequent pregnancy, according to scientific research investigations. So why do we hold this belief? Most likely it is because of a cognitive bias called illusory correlation that occurs when we focus on two events that stand out and occur together. When an adoption is closely followed by a pregnancy, our attention is drawn to the situation, and we are biased to conclude that there must be a causal connection. Such illusory correlations are also likely to occur when we are highly motivated to believe in the causal relationship.
Although this is a natural thing for us to do, it is not scientific. A scientific approach requires much more evidence before conclusions can be drawn.
Authority The philosopher Aristotle was concerned with the factors associated with persuasion or attitude change.
We believe good men more fully and readily than others. Similarly, many people are all too ready to accept anything they learn from the Internet, news media, books, government officials, or religious figures. They believe that the statements of such authorities must be true. The problem, of course, is that the statements may not be true. The scientific approach rejects the notion that one can accept on faith the statements of any authority; again, more evidence is needed before we can draw scientific conclusions.
Skepticism, Science, and the Empirical Approach The scientific approach to acquiring knowledge recognizes that both intuition and authority can be sources of ideas about behavior. Thus, scientists are very skeptical about what they see and hear.
Scientific skepticism means that ideas must be evaluated on the basis of careful logic and results from scientific investigations. If scientists reject intuition and blind acceptance of authority as ways of knowing about the world, how do they go about gaining knowledge? The fundamental characteristic of the scientific method is empiricism—the idea that knowledge is based on observations.
Data are collected that form the basis of conclusions about the nature of the world. The scientific method embodies a number of rules for collecting and evaluating data; these rules will be explored throughout the book. The power of the scientific approach can be seen all around us. Whether you look at biology, chemistry, medicine, physics, anthropology, or psychology, you will see amazing advances over the past 25, 50, or years. We have a greater understanding of the world around us, and the applications of that understanding have kept pace.
These characteristics are summarized below. Data play a central role. For scientists, knowledge is primarily based on observations. Scientists enthusiastically search for observations that will verify their ideas about the world. They develop theories, argue that existing data support their theories, and conduct research that can increase our confidence that the theories are correct.
Observations can be criticized, alternatives can be suggested, and data collection methods can be called into question. But in each of these cases, the role of data is central and fundamental. Scientists are not alone. Scientists make observations that are accurately reported to other scientists and the public. You can be sure that many other scientists will follow up on the findings by conducting research that replicates and extends these observations. Science is a way of thinking in which ideas do battle with other ideas in order to move ever closer to truth.
Research can be conducted to test any idea; supporters of the idea and those who disagree with the idea can report their research findings, and these can be evaluated by others. Some ideas, even some very good ideas, may prove to be wrong if research fails to provide support for them. Good scientific ideas are testable. They can be supported or they can be falsified by data—the latter concept called falsifiability Popper, If an idea is falsified when it is tested, science is thereby advanced because this result will spur the development of new and better ideas.
Scientific evidence is peer reviewed. Before a study is published in a topquality scientific journal, other scientists who have the expertise to carefully evaluate the research review it.
This process is called peer review. The role of these reviewers is to recommend whether the research should be published. This review process ensures that research with major flaws will not become part of the scientific literature. In essence, science exists in a free market of ideas in which the best ideas are supported by research and scientists can build upon the research of others to make further advances.
Integrating Intuition, Skepticism, and Authority The advantage of the scientific approach over other ways of knowing about the world is that it provides an objective set of rules for gathering, evaluating, and reporting information. It is an open system that allows ideas to be refuted or supported by others. This does not mean that intuition and authority are unimportant, however. As noted previously, scientists often rely on intuition and assertions of authorities for ideas for research.
Moreover, there is nothing wrong with accepting the assertions of authority as long as we do not accept them as scientific evidence. Often, scientific evidence is not obtainable, as, for example, when a religious figure or text asks us to accept certain beliefs on faith.
Some beliefs cannot be tested and thus are beyond the realm of science. In science, however, ideas must be evaluated on the basis of available evidence that can be used to support or refute the ideas. There is also nothing wrong with having opinions or beliefs as long as they are presented simply as opinions or beliefs.
However, we should always ask whether the opinion can be tested scientifically or whether scientific evidence exists that relates to the opinion. For example, opinions on whether exposure to media violence increases aggression are only opinions until scientific evidence on the issue is gathered. As you learn more about scientific methods, you will become increasingly skeptical of the research results reported in the media and the assertions of scientists as well.
You should be aware that scientists often become authorities when they express their ideas. When someone claims to be a scientist, should we be more willing to accept what he or she has to say? First, ask about the credentials of the individual. It is usually wise to pay more attention to someone with an established reputation in the field and attend to the reputation of the The Scientific Approach institution represented by the person.
Similarly, when an organization with a particular socialpolitical agenda funds the research that supports that agenda, you should be skeptical of the findings and closely examine the methods of the study.
You should also be skeptical of pseudoscientific research. The claim may be that a product or procedure will enhance your memory, relieve depression, or treat autism or post-traumatic stress disorder. The fact that these are all worthy outcomes makes us very susceptible to believing pseudoscientific claims and forgetting to ask whether there is a valid scientific basis for the claims.
In Chapter 2, we will discuss a procedure called facilitated communication that has been used by therapists working with children with autism. This technique produces impressive results, as the children are now able to express themselves. In Chapter 2, we will explore the scientific research that demonstrated that the facilitators, not the children, controlled the typing. The problem with all pseudoscience is that hopes are raised and promises will not be realized. Often the techniques can be dangerous as well.
In the case of facilitated communication, a number of facilitators typed messages accusing a parent of physically or sexually abusing the child.
Some parents were actually convicted of child abuse. In these legal cases, the scientific research on facilitated communication was used to help the defendant parent. Cases such as this have led to a movement to promote the exclusive use of evidence-based therapies—therapeutic interventions grounded in scientific research findings that demonstrate their effectiveness cf.
Figure 1. If scientific tests are reported, methodology is not scientific and validity of data is questionable. Supportive evidence tends to be anecdotal or to rely heavily on authorities that are socalled experts in the area of interest.
Genuine scientific references are not cited. Many of these claim to be associated with a reputable scientist or scientific organization, and then they take on a life of their own. A recent widely covered report, supposedly from the World Health Organization, claimed that the gene for blond hair was being selected out of the human gene pool.
Blond hair would be a disappearing trait! General rules to follow are 1 be highly skeptical of scientific assertions that are supported by only vague or improbable evidence, and 2 take the time to do an Internet search for supportive evidence. You can check many of the claims that are on the Internet on www. Description of Behavior The scientist begins with careful observation, because the first goal of science is to describe behavior—which can be something directly observable such as running speed, eye gaze, or loudness of laughter or something less observable like perceptions of attractiveness.
Male college students in rated the attractiveness of a large number of females shown in photographs. The same photographs were rated in by another group of students. The judgments of attractiveness of the females were virtually identical; standards of attractiveness apparently changed very little over this time period.
In another study, Cunningham compared the facial characteristics of females who were movie stars in the s and s with those of female stars of the s. Such measures included eye height, eye width, nose length, cheekbone prominence, and smile width, among others. These facial characteristics were highly similar across the two time periods, again indicating that standards of attractiveness remain constant over time. Researchers are often interested in describing the ways in which events are systematically related to one another.
Do jurors judge attractive defendants more leniently than unattractive defendants? Are people more likely to be persuaded by a speaker who has high credibility?
In what ways do cognitive abilities change as people grow older? Do students who study with a television set on score lower on exams than students who study in a quiet environment?
Do taller people make more money than shorter people? Do men find women wearing red clothing more attractive than women wearing a dark blue color?
Once it has been observed with some regularity that two events are systematically related to one another e. One implication of this process is that it allows us to anticipate events.
If you read about an upcoming trial of a very attractive defendant, you can predict that the person will likely receive a lenient sentence. Further, the ability to predict often helps us make better decisions.
For example, if you study the behavioral science research literature on attraction and relationships, you will learn about factors that predict long-term relationship satisfaction. You may be able to then use that information when predicting the likely success of your own relationships.
You can even take a test that was designed to measure these predictors of relationship success. Determining the Causes of Behavior A third goal of science is to determine the causes of behavior.
Although we might accurately predict the occurrence of a behavior, we might not correctly identify its cause. Unfortunately, unless we know that exposure to television violence is a cause of behavior, we cannot assert that aggressive behavior can be reduced by limiting scenes of violence on television. A child who is highly aggressive may prefer to watch violence when choosing television programs.
Or consider this example: Research by Elliot and Niesta indicates that men find women wearing red are more attractive than women wearing a color such as blue. Does the red clothing cause the perception of greater attractiveness?
Or is it possible that attractive women choose to wear brighter colors including red and less attractive women choose to wear darker colors? Should a woman wear red to help her be perceived as more attractive? We can only recommend this strategy if we know that the color red causes perception of greater attractiveness. We are now confronting questions of cause and effect: To know how to change behavior, we need to know the causes of behavior.
Cook and Campbell describe three types of evidence drawn from the work of philosopher John Stuart Mill used to identify the cause of a behavior. It is not enough to know that two events occur together, as in the case of knowing that watching television violence is a predictor of actual aggression.
To conclude causation, three things must occur: 1. There is a temporal order of events in which the cause precedes the effect. This is called temporal precedence. Thus, we need to know that television viewing occurred first and aggression followed. When the cause is present, the effect occurs; when the cause is not present, the effect does not occur. This is called covariation of cause and effect. We need to know that children who watch television violence behave aggressively and that children who do not watch television violence do not behave aggressively.
Nothing other than a causal variable could be responsible for the observed effect. This is called elimination of alternative explanations. There should be no other plausible alternative explanation for the relationship. In this case, the increased aggression could have an alternative explanation: lack of parental supervision. Causation will be discussed again in Chapter 4. Explanation of Behavior A final goal of science is to explain the events that have been described.
The scientist seeks to understand why the behavior occurs. Consider the relationship between television violence and aggression: Even if we know that TV violence is a cause of aggressiveness, we need to explain this relationship. Is it the result of psychological desensitization to violence and its effects?
Or does watching TV violence lead to a belief that aggression is a normal response to frustration and conflict? Further research is necessary to shed light on possible explanations of what has been observed. Usually, additional research like this is carried out by testing theories that are developed to explain particular behaviors. Description, prediction, determination of cause, and explanation are all closely intertwined.
Determining cause and explaining behavior are particularly closely related because it is difficult ever to know the true cause or all the causes of any behavior. An explanation that appears satisfactory may turn out to be inadequate when other causes are identified in subsequent research.
For example, when early research showed that speaker credibility is related to attitude change, the researchers explained the finding by stating that people are more willing to believe what is said by a person with high credibility than by one with low credibility. In short, there is a certain amount of ambiguity in the enterprise of scientific inquiry. New research findings almost always pose new questions that must be addressed by further research; explanations of behavior often must be discarded or revised as new evidence is gathered.
Such ambiguity is part of the excitement and fun of science. Studies are often designed to address theoretical issues concerning phenomena such as cognition, emotion, motivation, learning, neuropsychology, personality development, and social behavior.
Here are descriptions of a few journal articles that pertain to some basic research questions: Kool, W. Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, , — This study investigated choices that differed in the amount of required cognitive effort.
As expected, the participants chose to pursue options with the fewest cognitive demands. Rydell, R. The effect of negative performance stereotypes on learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, — After completing the first half of the tutorial, they were given math problems to solve.
At this point, a stereotype was invoked. Some participants were told that the purpose of the experiment was to examine reasons why females perform poorly in math. The other participants were not given this information. The second half of the tutorial was then presented and a second math performance measure was administered.
The participants receiving the negative stereotype information did perform poorly on the second math test; the other participants performed the same on both math tests. Jacovina, M.
Readers took longer to read the information about decision outcomes when there was a mismatch of decision preference and outcome. Applied Research The research articles listed above were concerned with basic processes of behavior and cognition rather than any immediate practical implications. To illustrate, here are a few summaries of journal articles about applied research: Ramesh, A.
Will they stay or will they go? The role of job embeddedness in predicting turnover in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, — Young, C. Depression in Asian-American and Caucasian undergraduate students. Journal of Affective Disorders, , — The results have implications for campus mental health programs. Braver, S. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, — The students whose parents had not moved had more positive scores on a number of adjustment measures.
Killen, J. Schatzberg, A. Randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of Bupropion combined with nicotine patch in the treatment of adolescent smokers. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 72, — In this study, adolescent smokers who received the antidepressant Bupropion along with a nicotine patch had the same success rate in stopping smoking as a group who received the nicotine patch alone.
Hyman, I. Did you see the unicycling clown? Inattentional blindness while walking and talking on a cell phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, — In one study, pedestrians walking across a campus square while using a cell phone walked more slowly and changed directions more frequently than others walking in the same location. In a second study, a clown rode a unicycle on the square. Pedestrians were asked if they noticed a clown on a unicycle after they had crossed the square. The cell phone users were much less likely to notice than pedestrians walking alone, with a friend, or while listening to music.
Is extraversion related to sensation-seeking? Do video games such as Grand Theft Auto increase aggression among children and young adults? How do neurons generate neurotransmitters? Does memory process visual images and sound simultaneously? How can a city increase recycling by residents? Which strategies are best for coping with natural disasters? At this point, you may be wondering if there is a definitive way to know whether a study should be considered basic or applied.
The distinction between basic and applied research is a convenient typology but is probably more accurately viewed as a continuum.
Notice in the listing of applied research studies that some are more applied than others. The study on adolescent smoking is very much applied—the data will be valuable for people who are planning smoking cessation programs for adolescents.
The study on depression among college students would be valuable on campuses that have mental health awareness and intervention programs for students. The study on child custody could be used as part of an argument in actual court cases. It could even be used by counselors working with couples in the process of divorce. The study on cell phone use is applied because of the widespread use of cell phones and the documentation of the problems they may cause.
However, the study would not necessarily lead to a solution to the problem. All of these studies are grounded in applied issues and solutions to problems, but they differ in how quickly and easily the results of the study can actually be used. Table 1. A major area of applied research is called program evaluation, which assesses the social reforms and innovations that occur in government, education, the criminal justice system, industry, health care, and mental health institutions.
He argued persuasively that social scientists should evaluate each program to determine whether it is having its intended effect. If it is not, alternative programs should be tried. Here are three sample journal articles about program evaluation: Reid, R. Pipe, A. Smoking rates were measured for a year following the treatment. The program was successful in reducing smoking. Grossman, J. Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22, — The to year-old youths participating in the program were less likely to skip school, begin using drugs or alcohol, or get into fights than the youths in the control group.
Kumpfer, K. Effectiveness outcomes of four age versions of the Strengthening Families Program in statewide field sites. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14 3 , — For most measures of improvement in family functioning, the program was effective across all child age groups. Much applied research is conducted in settings such as large business firms, marketing research companies, government agencies, and public polling organizations and is not published but rather is used within the company or by clients of the company.
Whether or not such results are published, however, they are used to help people make better decisions concerning problems that require immediate action. Comparing Basic and Applied Research Both basic and applied research are important, and neither can be considered superior to the other. In fact, progress in science is dependent on a synergy between basic and applied research.
Much applied research is guided by the theories and findings of basic research investigations. For example, one of the most effective treatment strategies for specific phobia—an anxiety disorder characterized by extreme fear reactions to specific objects or situations—is called exposure therapy Chambless et al. In exposure therapy, people who suffer from a phobia are exposed to the object of their fears in a safe setting while a therapist trains Illustrative Article: Introduction them in relaxation techniques in order to counter-program their fear reaction.
This behavioral treatment emerged from the work of Pavlov and Watson, who studied the processes by which animals acquire, maintain, and critically lose reflexive reactions to stimuli Wolpe, In recent years, many in our society, including legislators who control the budgets of research-granting agencies of the government, have demanded that research be directly relevant to specific social issues.
The problem with this attitude toward research is that we can never predict the ultimate applications of basic research. Psychologist B. Skinner, for example, conducted basic research in the s on operant conditioning, which carefully described the effects of reinforcement on such behaviors as bar pressing by rats. Years later, this research led to many practical applications in therapy, education, and industrial psychology. Research with no apparent practical value ultimately can be very useful.
The fact that no one can predict the eventual impact of basic research leads to the conclusion that support of basic research is necessary both to advance science and to benefit society. Behavioral research is important in many fields and has significant applications to public policy. This chapter has introduced you to the major goals and general types of research. All researchers use scientific methods, whether they are interested in basic, applied, or program evaluation questions.
The themes and concepts in this chapter will be expanded in the remainder of the book. They will be the basis on which you evaluate the research of others and plan your own research projects as well. This chapter emphasized that scientists are skeptical about what is true in the world; they insist that propositions be tested empirically. In the next two chapters, we will focus on two other characteristics of scientists. First, scientists have an intense curiosity about the world and find inspiration for ideas in many places.
Second, scientists have strong ethical principles; they are committed to treating those who participate in research investigations with respect and dignity. General Psychological Methodology Experimental Psychology.
Methods in Behavioral Research. Please contact us for any questions regarding this book.!! Printing in English language. More tools Find sellers with multiple copies Add to want list. I ordered it over a month ago. Excellent Customer Service Record. This reflects the ni of orders the seller has received and filled. Territorial restrictions may be printed on the book.
His research interests and experiences are varied. He received his Ph. People who bought this also bought. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.
0コメント